Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford FW-30
Utility
- power
- 265 hp
- displacement
- 903 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-30 vs Valmet 6250
Image not recorded
ValmetModel B
Valmet 6250
Row Crop
- power
- 79.1 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
FordFord FW-30
vs
ValmetValmet 6250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-30 higher · +186 hp (+235%)FW-30265 hp
625079.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-30 is in the 96th percentile; 6250 is in the 70th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-30 higher · +635 ci (+237%)FW-30903 ci
6250268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-30 is in the 98th percentile; 6250 is in the 76th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-30 higher · +4 (+100%)FW-308
62504
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-30 is in the 99th percentile; 6250 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ FW-30 higher · +21,610 lb (+223%)FW-3031,310 lb
62509,700 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
FW-30 is in the 97th percentile; 6250 is in the 85th · 5,107 models
FW-30 (A)6250 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | FW-30 | 6250 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Valmet | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 420 DSRE | — |
| Power Output | 265hp | 79.1hp | ▲ FW-30+186 hp · +235% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ FW-30+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 8 | 4 | ▲ FW-30+4 · +100% |
| Displacement | 903ci | 268ci | ▲ FW-30+635 ci · +237% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.3in | ▲ FW-30+1.2 in · +28% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 4.7in | ▲ FW-30+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Three-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 267in | 176in | ▲ FW-30+91 in · +52% |
| Width | Not recorded | 85.8in | — |
| Height | 94.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,310lb | 9,700lb | ▲ FW-30+21,610 lb · +223% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | III | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford FW-30 | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (265 hp)B · 70th percentile (79.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (903 ci)B · 76th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (31,310 lb)B · 85th percentile (9,700 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 98th percentile (267 in)B · 89th percentile (176 in)
A · FW-30B · 6250Median Utility Tractor