Image not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 876 vs Yanmar YM270

YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM270
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 55.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
FordFord 876
vs
YanmarYanmar YM270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 876 higher · +260 hp (+1300%)876280 hp
YM27020 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
876 is in the 92nd percentile; YM270 is in the 1st · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 876 higher · +556 ci (+1003%)876611 ci
YM27055.4 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
876 is in the 93rd percentile; YM270 is in the 1st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 876 higher · +4 (+200%)8766
YM2702
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
876 is in the 74th percentile; YM270 is in the 3rd · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 876 higher · +6 (+100%)87612
YM2706
Median Agricultural Tractor16
876 is in the 33rd percentile; YM270 is in the 11th · 972 models
876 (A)YM270 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 876 | YM270 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Yanmar | — |
| Model | LT10-A280 | 2W85 | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 20hp | ▲ 876+260 hp · +1300% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 2 | ▲ 876+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 611ci | 55.4ci | ▲ 876+556 ci · +1003% |
| Bore | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,100lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volts | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 14.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 876 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 92nd percentile (280 hp)B · 1st percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (611 ci)B · 1st percentile (55.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 33rd percentile (12)B · 11th percentile (6)
A · 876B · YM270Median Agricultural Tractor