Head to head · Utility
Ford 820 vs John Deere 9460RT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9460RT
Crawler
- power
- 460 hp
- displacement
- 827 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
FordFord 820
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9460RT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9460RT higher · +416 hp (+945%)82044 hp
9460RT460 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
820 is in the 38th percentile; 9460RT is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9460RT higher · +655 ci (+381%)820172 ci
9460RT827 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
820 is in the 46th percentile; 9460RT is in the 97th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9460RT higher · +2 (+50%)8204
9460RT6
Median Utility Tractor4
820 is in the 50th percentile; 9460RT is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9460RT higher · +13 (+260%)8205
9460RT18
Median Utility Tractor12
820 is in the 6th percentile; 9460RT is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
820 (A)9460RT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | 820 | 9460RT | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | PowerTech PSX | — |
| Power Output | 44hp | 460hp | ▲ 9460RT+416 hp · +945% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 820+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 9460RT+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 172ci | 827ci | ▲ 9460RT+655 ci · +381% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 5.2in | ▲ 9460RT+1.3 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 6.5in | ▲ 9460RT+2.9 in · +81% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized Gear | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 114in | 237in | ▲ 9460RT+123 in · +108% |
| Width | 64.8in | 136in | ▲ 9460RT+71.2 in · +110% |
| Height | 55.5in | 134in | ▲ 9460RT+78.5 in · +141% |
| Operating Weight | 3,400lb | 47,020lb | ▲ 9460RT+43,620 lb · +1283% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00-16 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 4N/4 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | 14.6gal | ▲ 9460RT+10.8 gal · +284% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 820 | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 38th percentile (44 hp)B · 99th percentile (460 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (172 ci)B · 97th percentile (827 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 6th percentile (5)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)B · 99th percentile (47,020 lb)
A · 820B · 9460RTMedian Utility Tractor