Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7000
Sub-Compact
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 68.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Cub Cadet 7000 vs Ford 6600
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 6600
Standard Tread
- power
- 75.5 hp
- displacement
- 256 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7000
vs
FordFord 6600
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 6600 higher · +55.5 hp (+278%)700020 hp
660075.5 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
7000 is in the 25th percentile; 6600 is in the 99th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6600 higher · +187 ci (+273%)700068.6 ci
6600256 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
7000 is in the 31st percentile; 6600 is in the 98th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 6600 higher · +1 (+33%)70003
66004
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
7000 is in the 50th percentile; 6600 is in the 90th · 802 models
7000 (A)6600 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Ford | — |
| Model | 7000 | 6600 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 20hp | 75.5hp | ▲ 6600+55.5 hp · +278% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 7000+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 6600+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 68.6ci | 256ci | ▲ 6600+187 ci · +273% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 6600+1.3 in · +42% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 6600+1.1 in · +35% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 46.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 78.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,837lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | 3.3gal | ▲ 6600+1.8 gal · +120% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 25th percentile (20 hp)B · 99th percentile (75.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 31st percentile (68.6 ci)B · 98th percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 90th percentile (4)
A · 7000B · 6600Median Sub-Compact Tractor