Comparing Ford 640 vs Shibaura SE3000

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Ford 640 and the Shibaura SE3000. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Ford 640
View tractor
Shibaura SE3000
View tractor
Images No images available No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Ford Shibaura
Engine - Model EAE Red Tiger LEM853
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 4 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 134 87.2
Engine - Bore (in) 3.44 3.35
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2000 2800
Engine - Power Output (hp) 31.01 30
Transmission
Transmission - Type Unsynchronized gear Gear
Transmission - Forward Gears 4 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 121.3 118.9
Width (in) 64.6 62.2
Height (in) 58.7 59.8
Operating Weight (lb) 3031 2568
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x2 2WD
Drive Type 2WD 2WD
Steering Type Manual -
Coolant Capacity (qts) 15 -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 28 -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Agricultural -
Manufacture - End Year 1957 -
Hitch Type - Category I
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) 1250 (at ends) -
Operator Station Type Open operator station -
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type Conventional -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) 540 -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Internal expanding shoes operated by two foot pedals -
Hydraulic System Type Open Center Open Center