ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Fendt Farmer 309C
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt Farmer 309C
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 21
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
FendtFendt Farmer 309C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +190 hp (+200%)65C285 hp
Farmer 309C95 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 45th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +443 ci (+227%)65C638 ci
Farmer 309C195 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 28th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
Farmer 309C4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmer 309C higher · +11 (+110%)65C10
Farmer 309C21
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; Farmer 309C is in the 91st · 179 models
65C (A)Farmer 309C (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 65C | Farmer 309C | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MWM | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 95hp | ▲ 65C+190 hp · +200% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ Farmer 309C+250 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 195ci | ▲ 65C+443 ci · +227% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.7in | ▲ 65C+1.1 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.6in | ▲ 65C+1.4 in · +30% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 158in | ▲ 65C+74 in · +47% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 106in | ▲ 65C+22 in · +21% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 9,305lb | ▲ 65C+23,570 lb · +253% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt Farmer 309C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 45th percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 28th percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 91st percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 31st percentile (9,305 lb)
A · 65CB · Farmer 309CMedian Crawler Tractor