Comparing Challenger MT655 vs Fendt 939 Vario

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Challenger MT655 and the Fendt 939 Vario. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Challenger MT655
View tractor
Fendt 939 Vario
View tractor
Images No images available No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Sisu Deutz
Engine - Model - TCD 7.8
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 513 473.2
Engine - Bore (in) 4.37 4.33
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) - 376 (EC 97/98)
Transmission
Transmission - Type Power shift Continuously-variable transmission
Transmission - Forward Gears 18 -
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - Infinite forward and reverse
Dimensions
Length (in) 203 222.6
Width (in) 98.2 108.3
Height (in) 121 132.8
Operating Weight (lb) 21500 23876
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type Power Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Ag (standard)
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type - -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Cab (assumed) Cab
Starter Type Electric Start Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) -