ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Fendt 927
FendtModel B
Fendt 927
Agricultural
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
FendtFendt 927
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +15 hp (+6%)65C285 hp
927270 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 927 is in the 59th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +202 ci (+46%)65C638 ci
927436 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 927 is in the 49th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
9276
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 927 is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +10,652 lb (+48%)65C32,875 lb
92722,223 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 927 is in the 49th · 173 models
65C (A)927 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 65C | 927 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 270hp | ▲ 65C+15 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 927+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 436ci | ▲ 65C+202 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.4in | ▲ 65C+0.6 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 223in | ▲ 65C+9 in · +4% |
| Width | 120in | 82.7in | ▲ 65C+37.3 in · +45% |
| Height | 128in | 131in | ▲ 927+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 22,223lb | ▲ 65C+10,652 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Fendt 927 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 59th percentile (270 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 49th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 49th percentile (22,223 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 79th percentile (223 in)
A · 65CB · 927Median Crawler Tractor