FarmallModel A
Farmall 766
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 360 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall 766 vs Iseki AT50
Image not recorded
FarmallFarmall 766
vs
IsekiIseki AT50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 766 higher · +180 ci (+100%)766360 ci
AT50180 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
766 is in the 42nd percentile; AT50 is in the 6th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 766 higher · +2 (+50%)7666
AT504
Median Row Crop Tractor6
766 is in the 50th percentile; AT50 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ AT50 higher · +8 (+50%)76616
AT5024
Median Row Crop Tractor16
766 is in the 50th percentile; AT50 is in the 81st · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 766 higher · +6,486 lb (+170%)76610,300 lb
AT503,814 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
766 is in the 34th percentile; AT50 is in the 4th · 1,350 models
766 (A)AT50 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Iseki | — |
| Model | 766 | AT50 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Iseki | — |
| Model | Not recorded | E4DE | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 49.4hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ AT50+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 766+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 360ci | 180ci | ▲ 766+180 ci · +100% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.8in | ▲ 766+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 3.9in | ▲ 766+1.2 in · +31% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 139in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 89.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,300lb | 3,814lb | ▲ 766+6,486 lb · +170% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall 766 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 42nd percentile (360 ci)B · 6th percentile (180 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 81st percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 34th percentile (10,300 lb)B · 4th percentile (3,814 lb)
A · 766B · AT50Median Row Crop Tractor