Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210
Deutz-FahrModel B
Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210
Utility
- power
- 38.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
Deutz-FahrDeutz-Fahr Agrokid 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +45.8 hp (+120%)Farmall 9084 hp
Agrokid 21038.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; Agrokid 210 is in the 32nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +183 ci (+199%)Farmall 90274 ci
Agrokid 21091.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; Agrokid 210 is in the 20th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 904
Agrokid 2104
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; Agrokid 210 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedFarmall 9012
Agrokid 21012
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; Agrokid 210 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)Agrokid 210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Deutz-Fahr | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | Agrokid 210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | FPT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 38.2hp | ▲ Farmall 90+45.8 hp · +120% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Agrokid 210+700 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 91.5ci | ▲ Farmall 90+183 ci · +199% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.1in | ▲ Farmall 90+1 in · +32% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 3.1in | ▲ Farmall 90+2.1 in · +68% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 116in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 49.3in | — |
| Height | 101in | 77in | ▲ Farmall 90+24 in · +31% |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 2,491lb | ▲ Farmall 90+3,211 lb · +129% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 5,070lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 32nd percentile (38.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,491 lb)
A · Farmall 90B · Agrokid 210Median Utility Tractor