Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7275
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 7275 vs Yanmar YM270
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM270
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 55.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7275
vs
YanmarYanmar YM270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7275 higher · +7 hp (+35%)727527 hp
YM27020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7275 is in the 19th percentile; YM270 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7275 higher · +35.9 ci (+65%)727591.3 ci
YM27055.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7275 is in the 17th percentile; YM270 is in the 4th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 7275 higher · +1 (+50%)72753
YM2702
Median Utility Tractor4
7275 is in the 23rd percentile; YM270 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
7275 (A)YM270 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 7275 | YM270 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | K3M | 2W85 | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 20hp | ▲ 7275+7 hp · +35% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 7275+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 91.3ci | 55.4ci | ▲ 7275+35.9 ci · +65% |
| Bore | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 54in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 84.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,685lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | With ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)B · 4th percentile (55.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
A · 7275B · YM270Median Utility Tractor