Comparing Cub Cadet 1863 vs Cub Cadet 682

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Cub Cadet 1863 and the Cub Cadet 682. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Cub Cadet 1863
View tractor
Cub Cadet 682
View tractor
Images No images available No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Kohler Kohler
Engine - Model Command KT17
Engine - Cooling Type Air-cooled Air-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 2 2
Engine - Displacement (ci) 38.1 42.2
Engine - Bore (in) 3.03 3.11
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM - -
Engine - Power Output (hp) 18 17
Transmission
Transmission - Type Shaft-driven hydrostatic Hydrostatic
Transmission - Forward Gears Infinite Infinite
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 71.7 71.7
Width (in) 37.4 37.4
Height (in) 43.7 42.9
Operating Weight (lb) 871 661
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x2
Drive Type 2WD 2WD
Steering Type Manual Manual
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Lawn/Turf Lawn/Turf
Manufacture - End Year 1997 1985
Hitch Type - Sleeve Hitch (optional)
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Open operator station Open
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type Independent with electric clutch Independent with electric clutch
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Dual disc Integral Wet Disc
Hydraulic System Type - -