Comparing Cub Cadet 126 vs Ford 820

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Cub Cadet 126 and the Ford 820. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Cub Cadet 126
View tractor
Ford 820
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Kohler Ford
Engine - Model K301A -
Engine - Cooling Type Air-cooled -
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline, LP Gas
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 1 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 29 172
Engine - Bore (in) 3.37 3.9
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 3600 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 12 44
Transmission
Transmission - Type Gear type with dry disc clutch or Creeper Unsynchronized Gear
Transmission - Forward Gears 3 or 6 5
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 63.8 113.6
Width (in) 35.8 64.75
Height (in) 39.4 55.5
Operating Weight (lb) 640 3400
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD -
Drive Type 2WD -
Steering Type Manual Manual
Coolant Capacity (qts) - 15
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Lawn/turf Ag Front: 6.00-16, Ag Rear: Unknown
Manufacture - End Year 1971 1957
Hitch Type Three-Point (optional) -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Open operator station -
Starter Type Electric -
PTO Type Transmission with dry disc clutch -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) 3600 (Front PTO) -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) 515 (Rear PTO) -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Dry disc -
Hydraulic System Type - -