ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Cockshutt 30
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 30
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 30
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +485 ci (+317%)65C638 ci
30153 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 30 is in the 21st · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
304
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 30 is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+25%)65C10
308
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 30 is in the 41st · 179 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +28,283 lb (+616%)65C32,875 lb
304,592 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 30 is in the 15th · 173 models
65C (A)30 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | 65C | 30 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Buda | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 65C+600 RPM · +40% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 153ci | ▲ 65C+485 ci · +317% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.4in | ▲ 65C+1.4 in · +41% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.1in | ▲ 65C+1.9 in · +46% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 132in | ▲ 65C+100 in · +76% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 60in | ▲ 65C+68 in · +113% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 4,592lb | ▲ 65C+28,283 lb · +616% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,285rpm | — |
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 31.6hp | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | Nov-38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 4.5gal | ▲ 65C+6.5 gal · +144% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 21st percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 41st percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 15th percentile (4,592 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 40th percentile (132 in)
A · 65CB · 30Median Crawler Tractor