Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1650
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 283 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1650 vs Leyland 245
Image not recorded
LeylandModel B
Leyland 245
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CockshuttCockshutt 1650
vs
LeylandLeyland 245
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 1650 higher · +130 ci (+85%)1650283 ci
245153 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1650 is in the 28th percentile; 245 is in the 4th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1650 higher · +3 (+100%)16506
2453
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1650 is in the 50th percentile; 245 is in the 2nd · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1650 higher · +1,935 lb (+33%)16507,815 lb
2455,880 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1650 is in the 19th percentile; 245 is in the 11th · 1,350 models
Length
▲ 1650 higher · +29 in (+23%)1650155 in
245126 in
Median Row Crop Tractor180 in
1650 is in the 20th percentile; 245 is in the 4th · 1,157 models
1650 (A)245 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Leyland | — |
| Model | 1650 | 245 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Leyland | — |
| Model | 4.6L 6-cyl diesel | D3.152 | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 50hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 245+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 1650+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 283ci | 153ci | ▲ 1650+130 ci · +85% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 1650+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4in | 5in | ▲ 245+1 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 6-speed unsynchronized | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 126in | ▲ 1650+29 in · +23% |
| Width | 81.5in | 63.8in | ▲ 1650+17.7 in · +28% |
| Height | 80in | 90.6in | ▲ 245+10.6 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 7,815lb | 5,880lb | ▲ 1650+1,935 lb · +33% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II/I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Manual External Compression Band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 1.9gal | ▲ 1650+3.1 gal · +163% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 28th percentile (283 ci)B · 4th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 2nd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 19th percentile (7,815 lb)B · 11th percentile (5,880 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 20th percentile (155 in)B · 4th percentile (126 in)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 28th percentile (81.5 in)B · 3rd percentile (63.8 in)
A · 1650B · 245Median Row Crop Tractor