ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Cockshutt 1600
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1600
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 265 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1600
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +373 ci (+141%)65C638 ci
1600265 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 1600 is in the 36th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
16006
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 1600 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +4 (+67%)65C10
16006
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 1600 is in the 34th · 179 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +25,475 lb (+344%)65C32,875 lb
16007,400 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; 1600 is in the 27th · 173 models
65C (A)1600 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | 65C | 1600 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Waukesha-Oliver | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 4.3L 6-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ 65C+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 265ci | ▲ 65C+373 ci · +141% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.8in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4in | ▲ 65C+2 in · +50% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 7,400lb | ▲ 65C+25,475 lb · +344% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Cockshutt 1600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 36th percentile (265 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 34th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 27th percentile (7,400 lb)
A · 65CB · 1600Median Crawler Tractor