CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1250-A
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 143 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Cockshutt 1250-A vs Leyland 245
Image not recorded
LeylandModel B
Leyland 245
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CockshuttCockshutt 1250-A
vs
LeylandLeyland 245
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ 245 higher · +10 ci (+7%)1250-A143 ci
245153 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
1250-A is in the 81st percentile; 245 is in the 85th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1250-A3
2453
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
1250-A is in the 50th percentile; 245 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 245 higher · +2,760 lb (+88%)1250-A3,120 lb
2455,880 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
1250-A is in the 59th percentile; 245 is in the 97th · 711 models
1250-A (A)245 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Leyland | — |
| Model | 1250-A | 245 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Leyland | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D3.152 | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 50hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 1250-A+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 143ci | 153ci | ▲ 245+10 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.6in | ▲ 1250-A+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ 245+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 126in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 63.8in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 90.6in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,120lb | 5,880lb | ▲ 245+2,760 lb · +88% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 (1.375) | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II/I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Leyland 245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.9gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 81st percentile (143 ci)B · 85th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 59th percentile (3,120 lb)B · 97th percentile (5,880 lb)
A · 1250-AB · 245Median Sub-Compact Tractor