ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Claas Xerion 3300 Trac
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 3300 Trac
Agricultural
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300 Trac
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ Xerion 3300 Trac higher · +50 hp (+18%)65C285 hp
Xerion 3300 Trac335 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 69th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +101 ci (+19%)65C638 ci
Xerion 3300 Trac537 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 59th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
Xerion 3300 Trac6
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +10,384 lb (+46%)65C32,875 lb
Xerion 3300 Trac22,491 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 49th · 173 models
65C (A)Xerion 3300 Trac (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | 65C | Xerion 3300 Trac | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3306 DITA | C9 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 335hp | ▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+50 hp · +18% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 65C+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 537ci | ▲ 65C+101 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.9in | ▲ 65C+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 261in | ▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+29 in · +13% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 147in | ▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+19 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 22,491lb | ▲ 65C+10,384 lb · +46% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 69th percentile (335 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 59th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 49th percentile (22,491 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 93rd percentile (261 in)
A · 65CB · Xerion 3300 TracMedian Crawler Tractor