ClaasModel A
Claas Challenger 95E
Crawler
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Claas Challenger 95E vs White Workhorse 145
WhiteModel B
White Workhorse 145
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 359 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ClaasClaas Challenger 95E
vs
WhiteWhite Workhorse 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +370 ci (+103%)Challenger 95E729 ci
Workhorse 145359 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
Challenger 95E is in the 75th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 44th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedChallenger 95E6
Workhorse 1456
Median Crawler Tractor6
Challenger 95E is in the 50th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ Workhorse 145 higher · +8 (+80%)Challenger 95E10
Workhorse 14518
Median Crawler Tractor10
Challenger 95E is in the 50th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 87th · 179 models
Operating Weight
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +20,855 lb (+142%)Challenger 95E35,520 lb
Workhorse 14514,665 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
Challenger 95E is in the 76th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 43rd · 173 models
Challenger 95E (A)Workhorse 145 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | White | — |
| Model | Challenger 95E | Workhorse 145 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | CDC-Cummins | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Workhorse 145+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | 359ci | ▲ Challenger 95E+370 ci · +103% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4in | ▲ Challenger 95E+1.1 in · +27% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 4.7in | ▲ Challenger 95E+1.2 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 175in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,520lb | 14,665lb | ▲ Challenger 95E+20,855 lb · +142% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | closed center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Caliper Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12-volt | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab (Standard) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 75th percentile (729 ci)B · 44th percentile (359 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 87th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 76th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 43rd percentile (14,665 lb)
A · Challenger 95EB · Workhorse 145Median Crawler Tractor