ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT975B
Articulated
- power
- 585 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT975B vs New Holland TN85A
New HollandModel B
New Holland TN85A
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT975B
vs
New HollandNew Holland TN85A
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT975B higher · +505 hp (+631%)MT975B585 hp
TN85A80 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT975B is in the 93rd percentile; TN85A is in the 1st · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975B higher · +831 ci (+303%)MT975B1,105 ci
TN85A274 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT975B is in the 99th percentile; TN85A is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT975B higher · +2 (+50%)MT975B6
TN85A4
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT975B is in the 50th percentile; TN85A is in the 1st · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT975B higher · +4 (+33%)MT975B16
TN85A12
Median Articulated Tractor16
MT975B is in the 50th percentile; TN85A is in the 11th · 59 models
MT975B (A)TN85A (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT975B | TN85A | — |
| Category | Articulated | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Iveco | — |
| Model | C18 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 585hp | 80hp | ▲ MT975B+505 hp · +631% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TN85A+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MT975B+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 274ci | ▲ MT975B+831 ci · +303% |
| Bore | 5.7in | 4.1in | ▲ MT975B+1.6 in · +39% |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 5.2in | ▲ MT975B+2 in · +38% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | Partially synchronized with mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 298in | 158in | ▲ MT975B+140 in · +89% |
| Width | 200in | 67.2in | ▲ MT975B+133 in · +198% |
| Height | 151in | 95.1in | ▲ MT975B+55.9 in · +59% |
| Operating Weight | 59,820lb | 6,008lb | ▲ MT975B+53,812 lb · +896% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center PFC | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | IVN/III Opt | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,968lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | New Holland TN85A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 93rd percentile (585 hp)B · 1st percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)B · 1st percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 11th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 96th percentile (59,820 lb)B · 1st percentile (6,008 lb)
A · MT975BB · TN85AMedian Articulated Tractor