ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT975B
Articulated
- power
- 585 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT975B vs Kirovets K-5280 ATM
Image not recorded
KirovetsModel B
Kirovets K-5280 ATM
Row Crop
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 40
ChallengerChallenger MT975B
vs
KirovetsKirovets K-5280 ATM
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT975B higher · +305 hp (+109%)MT975B585 hp
K-5280 ATM280 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT975B is in the 93rd percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 3rd · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975B higher · +669 ci (+153%)MT975B1,105 ci
K-5280 ATM436 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT975B is in the 99th percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT975B6
K-5280 ATM6
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT975B is in the 50th percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ K-5280 ATM higher · +24 (+150%)MT975B16
K-5280 ATM40
Median Articulated Tractor16
MT975B is in the 50th percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 99th · 59 models
MT975B (A)K-5280 ATM (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kirovets | — |
| Model | MT975B | K-5280 ATM | — |
| Category | Articulated | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Deutz | — |
| Model | C18 | BF6M 1013C | — |
| Power Output | 585hp | 280hp | ▲ MT975B+305 hp · +109% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ K-5280 ATM+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 436ci | ▲ MT975B+669 ci · +153% |
| Bore | 5.7in | 4.3in | ▲ MT975B+1.4 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 5.1in | ▲ MT975B+2.1 in · +41% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 298in | 217in | ▲ MT975B+81 in · +37% |
| Width | 200in | 98.4in | ▲ MT975B+102 in · +103% |
| Height | 151in | 126in | ▲ MT975B+25 in · +20% |
| Operating Weight | 59,820lb | 18,080lb | ▲ MT975B+41,740 lb · +231% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center PFC | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | IVN/III Opt | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Kirovets K-5280 ATM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 93rd percentile (585 hp)B · 3rd percentile (280 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)B · 1st percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 99th percentile (40)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 96th percentile (59,820 lb)B · 1st percentile (18,080 lb)
A · MT975BB · K-5280 ATMMedian Articulated Tractor