ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT862
Agricultural
- power
- 610 hp
- displacement
- 934 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT862 vs LS XJ25
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS XJ25
Utility
- power
- 24.4 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT862
vs
LSLS XJ25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT862 higher · +586 hp (+2400%)MT862610 hp
XJ2524.4 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT862 is in the 99th percentile; XJ25 is in the 2nd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT862 higher · +854 ci (+1062%)MT862934 ci
XJ2580.4 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; XJ25 is in the 1st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT862 higher · +3 (+100%)MT8626
XJ253
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT862 is in the 74th percentile; XJ25 is in the 8th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT862 higher · +40,170 lb (+2195%)MT86242,000 lb
XJ251,830 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; XJ25 is in the 1st · 971 models
MT862 (A)XJ25 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | LS | — |
| Model | MT862 | XJ25 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | D3876 | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 610hp | 24.4hp | ▲ MT862+586 hp · +2400% |
| Rated RPM | 1,730RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ XJ25+770 RPM · +45% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ MT862+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 934ci | 80.4ci | ▲ MT862+854 ci · +1062% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 3.1in | ▲ MT862+2.3 in · +74% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 3.6in | ▲ MT862+3.1 in · +86% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | 103in | ▲ MT862+163 in · +158% |
| Width | 116in | 44.9in | ▲ MT862+71.1 in · +158% |
| Height | 148in | 85in | ▲ MT862+63 in · +74% |
| Operating Weight | 42,000lb | 1,830lb | ▲ MT862+40,170 lb · +2195% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 99th percentile (610 hp)B · 2nd percentile (24.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 98th percentile (934 ci)B · 1st percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 8th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 98th percentile (42,000 lb)B · 1st percentile (1,830 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 99th percentile (266 in)B · 3rd percentile (103 in)
A · MT862B · XJ25Median Agricultural Tractor