ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT862
Agricultural
- power
- 610 hp
- displacement
- 934 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT862 vs Chamberlain Canelander
ChamberlainModel B
Chamberlain Canelander
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 270 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
ChallengerChallenger MT862
vs
ChamberlainChamberlain Canelander
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT862 higher · +548 hp (+884%)MT862610 hp
Canelander62 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT862 is in the 99th percentile; Canelander is in the 15th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT862 higher · +664 ci (+246%)MT862934 ci
Canelander270 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; Canelander is in the 40th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT862 higher · +2 (+50%)MT8626
Canelander4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT862 is in the 74th percentile; Canelander is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT862 higher · +34,650 lb (+471%)MT86242,000 lb
Canelander7,350 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; Canelander is in the 26th · 971 models
MT862 (A)Canelander (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Chamberlain | — |
| Model | MT862 | Canelander | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility, High-Clearance | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Perkins | — |
| Model | D3876 | 4-270D | — |
| Power Output | 610hp | 62hp | ▲ MT862+548 hp · +884% |
| Rated RPM | 1,730RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ Canelander+270 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MT862+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 934ci | 270ci | ▲ MT862+664 ci · +246% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 4.3in | ▲ MT862+1.1 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 4.8in | ▲ MT862+1.9 in · +40% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | 149in | ▲ MT862+117 in · +79% |
| Width | 116in | 79in | ▲ MT862+37 in · +47% |
| Height | 148in | 75.5in | ▲ MT862+72.5 in · +96% |
| Operating Weight | 42,000lb | 7,350lb | ▲ MT862+34,650 lb · +471% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Chamberlain Canelander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 99th percentile (610 hp)B · 15th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 98th percentile (934 ci)B · 40th percentile (270 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 31st percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 98th percentile (42,000 lb)B · 26th percentile (7,350 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 99th percentile (266 in)B · 26th percentile (149 in)
A · MT862B · CanelanderMedian Agricultural Tractor