Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT745
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 255 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 30
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT745 vs Schluter Compact 750
SchluterModel B
Schluter Compact 750
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 218 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT745
vs
SchluterSchluter Compact 750
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT745 higher · +187 hp (+275%)MT745255 hp
Compact 75068 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT745 is in the 17th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT745 higher · +319 ci (+146%)MT745537 ci
Compact 750218 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT745 is in the 13th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ MT745 higher · +3 (+100%)MT7456
Compact 7503
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT745 is in the 50th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT745 higher · +18 (+150%)MT74530
Compact 75012
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT745 is in the 99th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 27th · 146 models
MT745 (A)Compact 750 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Schluter | — |
| Model | MT745 | Compact 750 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Schluter | — |
| Model | Not recorded | SDM 110 W 3 | — |
| Power Output | 255hp | 68hp | ▲ MT745+187 hp · +275% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ MT745+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 537ci | 218ci | ▲ MT745+319 ci · +146% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ MT745+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 4.9in | ▲ MT745+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift / Creeper | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 155in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 96.9in | — |
| Operating Weight | 28,195lb | 7,342lb | ▲ MT745+20,853 lb · +284% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 17th percentile (255 hp)B · 1st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 13th percentile (537 ci)B · 1st percentile (218 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 99th percentile (30)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 26th percentile (28,195 lb)B · 1st percentile (7,342 lb)
A · MT745B · Compact 750Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor