Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665B
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665B vs Ursus C-350
ChallengerChallenger MT665B
vs
UrsusUrsus C-350
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT665B higher · +240 hp (+480%)MT665B290 hp
C-35050 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665B is in the 93rd percentile; C-350 is in the 9th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT665B higher · +323 ci (+170%)MT665B513 ci
C-350190 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665B is in the 88th percentile; C-350 is in the 15th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT665B higher · +2 (+50%)MT665B6
C-3504
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665B is in the 74th percentile; C-350 is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT665B higher · +8 (+80%)MT665B18
C-35010
Median Agricultural Tractor16
MT665B is in the 68th percentile; C-350 is in the 23rd · 972 models
MT665B (A)C-350 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ursus | — |
| Model | MT665B | C-350 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Ursus | — |
| Model | 84ETA | S-4001 | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 50hp | ▲ MT665B+240 hp · +480% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ MT665B+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MT665B+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 513ci | 190ci | ▲ MT665B+323 ci · +170% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.7in | ▲ MT665B+0.7 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 4.3in | ▲ MT665B+1.4 in · +33% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 128in | ▲ MT665B+78 in · +61% |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 4,829lb | ▲ MT665B+14,721 lb · +305% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Manual External Compression Band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 9th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 15th percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (18)B · 23rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 11th percentile (4,829 lb)
A · MT665BB · C-350Median Agricultural Tractor