Comparing AGCO DT200 vs Challenger MT655B

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the AGCO DT200 and the Challenger MT655B. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

AGCO DT200
View tractor
Challenger MT655B
View tractor
Images No images available No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Cummins Sisu
Engine - Model C8.3 84ETA
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - 24-valve
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 505 513
Engine - Bore (in) 4.49 4.37
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 235 260
Transmission
Transmission - Type Full Power Shift continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission - Forward Gears 18 Infinite
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 202.8 206
Width (in) 98 118
Height (in) 120.9 123.6
Operating Weight (lb) 19,700 19550 - 20290
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD -
Drive Type 4WD -
Steering Type Hydrostatic Power -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - 35.6
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Ag
Manufacture - End Year 2004 -
Hitch Type Three-Point Hitch III
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) 19,000 lbs -
Operator Station Type Cab Standard -
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type Independent -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) 1000 -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Hydraulic Wet Disc -
Hydraulic System Type Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) pressure flow compensated (PFC)