Comparing CaseIH Farmall 25A vs Challenger MT635

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Farmall 25A and the Challenger MT635. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Farmall 25A
View tractor
Challenger MT635
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Mitsubishi Sisu
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 3 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 80.4 449
Engine - Bore (in) 3.07 4.251
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2500 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 24.6 -
Transmission
Transmission - Type sync shuttle / hydrostatic Power shift
Transmission - Forward Gears 12 18
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 117.2 203
Width (in) - 98.2
Height (in) 88.2 121 (cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 2469 18975
Miscellaneous
Chassis - 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type - 4WD
Steering Type - Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Rear tires - Two 18.4R42; Front tires - Two 14.9R30
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type - Type III
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - Cab
Starter Type Electric Starter Electric
PTO Type 540 (1.375) -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Open Center Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)