ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT335B
Utility
- power
- 78 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT335B vs Yanmar YM270
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM270
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 55.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
ChallengerChallenger MT335B
vs
YanmarYanmar YM270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT335B higher · +58 hp (+290%)MT335B78 hp
YM27020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT335B is in the 70th percentile; YM270 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT335B higher · +146 ci (+263%)MT335B201 ci
YM27055.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT335B is in the 55th percentile; YM270 is in the 4th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT335B higher · +1 (+50%)MT335B3
YM2702
Median Utility Tractor4
MT335B is in the 23rd percentile; YM270 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT335B higher · +6 (+100%)MT335B12
YM2706
Median Utility Tractor12
MT335B is in the 50th percentile; YM270 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
MT335B (A)YM270 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Yanmar | — |
| Model | MT335B | YM270 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 2W85 | — |
| Power Output | 78hp | 20hp | ▲ MT335B+58 hp · +290% |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ MT335B+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 55.4ci | ▲ MT335B+146 ci · +263% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed Synchronized Shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT335B | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Either Cab or Open (ROPS) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 70th percentile (78 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 4th percentile (55.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 11th percentile (6)
A · MT335BB · YM270Median Utility Tractor