Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255 vs Mahindra 6065
Image not recorded
MahindraModel B
Mahindra 6065
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 162 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 15
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
MahindraMahindra 6065
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 6065 higher · +33.6 hp (+118%)MT25528.4 hp
606562 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT255 is in the 20th percentile; 6065 is in the 56th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6065 higher · +72.7 ci (+81%)MT25589.3 ci
6065162 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255 is in the 15th percentile; 6065 is in the 43rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2553
60653
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; 6065 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6065 higher · +6 (+67%)MT2559
606515
Median Utility Tractor12
MT255 is in the 35th percentile; 6065 is in the 64th · 4,941 models
MT255 (A)6065 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Mahindra | — |
| Model | MT255 | 6065 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Mahindra | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 62hp | ▲ 6065+33.6 hp · +118% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 162ci | ▲ 6065+72.7 ci · +81% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.8in | ▲ 6065+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 4.8in | ▲ 6065+1.5 in · +45% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 51in | 73.2in | ▲ 6065+22.2 in · +44% |
| Height | 79.3in | 104in | ▲ 6065+24.7 in · +31% |
| Operating Weight | 2,248lb | 6,096lb | ▲ 6065+3,848 lb · +171% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | CAT I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,323lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 56th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 43rd percentile (162 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 64th percentile (15)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,096 lb)
A · MT255B · 6065Median Utility Tractor