Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 95E
Agricultural
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 95E vs White Workhorse 145
WhiteModel B
White Workhorse 145
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 359 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger 95E
vs
WhiteWhite Workhorse 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 95E higher · +370 ci (+103%)95E729 ci
Workhorse 145359 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
95E is in the 95th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 55th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied95E6
Workhorse 1456
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
95E is in the 74th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ Workhorse 145 higher · +8 (+80%)95E10
Workhorse 14518
Median Agricultural Tractor16
95E is in the 23rd percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 68th · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ 95E higher · +20,855 lb (+142%)95E35,520 lb
Workhorse 14514,665 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
95E is in the 97th percentile; Workhorse 145 is in the 68th · 971 models
95E (A)Workhorse 145 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | White | — |
| Model | 95E | Workhorse 145 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | CDC-Cummins | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Workhorse 145+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | 359ci | ▲ 95E+370 ci · +103% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4in | ▲ 95E+1.1 in · +27% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 4.7in | ▲ 95E+1.2 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 175in | — |
| Width | 25in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,520lb | 14,665lb | ▲ 95E+20,855 lb · +142% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | closed center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Tracks | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic caliper disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12-volt | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 95E | White Workhorse 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 95th percentile (729 ci)B · 55th percentile (359 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 68th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 68th percentile (14,665 lb)
A · 95EB · Workhorse 145Median Agricultural Tractor