ChallengerModel A
Challenger 85C
Crawler
- power
- 355 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 85C vs Schluter Compact 750
SchluterModel B
Schluter Compact 750
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 218 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 85C
vs
SchluterSchluter Compact 750
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 85C higher · +287 hp (+422%)85C355 hp
Compact 75068 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
85C is in the 72nd percentile; Compact 750 is in the 38th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 85C higher · +411 ci (+189%)85C629 ci
Compact 750218 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
85C is in the 67th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 30th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 85C higher · +3 (+100%)85C6
Compact 7503
Median Crawler Tractor6
85C is in the 50th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 10th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ Compact 750 higher · +2 (+20%)85C10
Compact 75012
Median Crawler Tractor10
85C is in the 50th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 54th · 179 models
85C (A)Compact 750 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Schluter | — |
| Model | 85C | Compact 750 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Schluter | — |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | SDM 110 W 3 | — |
| Power Output | 355hp | 68hp | ▲ 85C+287 hp · +422% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 85C+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 629ci | 218ci | ▲ 85C+411 ci · +189% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 85C+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 85C+0.6 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 155in | ▲ 85C+77 in · +50% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 96.9in | ▲ 85C+31.1 in · +32% |
| Operating Weight | 33,645lb | 7,342lb | ▲ 85C+26,303 lb · +358% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 72nd percentile (355 hp)B · 38th percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 67th percentile (629 ci)B · 30th percentile (218 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 10th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 70th percentile (33,645 lb)B · 27th percentile (7,342 lb)
A · 85CB · Compact 750Median Crawler Tractor