ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75C vs Valmet 6250
Image not recorded
ValmetModel B
Valmet 6250
Row Crop
- power
- 79.1 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
ChallengerChallenger 75C
vs
ValmetValmet 6250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 75C higher · +246 hp (+311%)75C325 hp
625079.1 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75C is in the 13th percentile; 6250 is in the 1st · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75C higher · +361 ci (+135%)75C629 ci
6250268 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75C is in the 13th percentile; 6250 is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ 75C higher · +2 (+50%)75C6
62504
Median Articulated Tractor6
75C is in the 50th percentile; 6250 is in the 1st · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6250 higher · +26 (+260%)75C10
625036
Median Articulated Tractor16
75C is in the 3rd percentile; 6250 is in the 99th · 59 models
75C (A)6250 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Valmet | — |
| Model | 75C | 6250 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Valmet | — |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | 420 DSRE | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 79.1hp | ▲ 75C+246 hp · +311% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 6250+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 75C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 629ci | 268ci | ▲ 75C+361 ci · +135% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 75C+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 75C+0.8 in · +17% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Three-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 176in | ▲ 75C+56 in · +32% |
| Width | 120in | 85.8in | ▲ 75C+34.2 in · +40% |
| Height | 144in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,305lb | 9,700lb | ▲ 75C+23,605 lb · +243% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear 1000 | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Valmet 6250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 1st percentile (79.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 99th percentile (36)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 8th percentile (33,305 lb)B · 1st percentile (9,700 lb)
A · 75CB · 6250Median Articulated Tractor