ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65
Crawler
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65 vs Massey Ferguson 210
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65 higher · +245 hp (+980%)65270 hp
21025 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65 is in the 59th percentile; 210 is in the 9th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65 higher · +561 ci (+727%)65638 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65 is in the 70th percentile; 210 is in the 3rd · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65 higher · +4 (+200%)656
2102
Median Crawler Tractor6
65 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 1st · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 210 higher · +2 (+20%)6510
21012
Median Crawler Tractor10
65 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 54th · 179 models
65 (A)210 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 65 | 210 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Toyosha | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | P126 | — |
| Power Output | 270hp | 25hp | ▲ 65+245 hp · +980% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 210+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 2 | ▲ 65+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 77.1ci | ▲ 65+561 ci · +727% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.6in | ▲ 65+1.2 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 6in | 3.7in | ▲ 65+2.3 in · +62% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 225in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 113in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 127in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,200lb | 2,325lb | ▲ 65+30,875 lb · +1328% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 1.3gal | ▲ 65+9.7 gal · +746% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 59th percentile (270 hp)B · 9th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 3rd percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (33,200 lb)B · 4th percentile (2,325 lb)
A · 65B · 210Median Crawler Tractor