Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs Hurlimann H-6136
Image not recorded
HurlimannModel B
Hurlimann H-6136
Agricultural
- power
- 130 hp
- displacement
- 418 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
HurlimannHurlimann H-6136
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1042 higher · +280 hp (+215%)1042410 hp
H-6136130 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; H-6136 is in the 2nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1042 higher · +340 ci (+81%)1042758 ci
H-6136418 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; H-6136 is in the 3rd · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10426
H-61366
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
1042 is in the 50th percentile; H-6136 is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1042 higher · +19,091 lb (+152%)104231,615 lb
H-613612,524 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
1042 is in the 35th percentile; H-6136 is in the 1st · 132 models
1042 (A)H-6136 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Hurlimann | — |
| Model | 1042 | H-6136 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | SAME | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 130hp | ▲ 1042+280 hp · +215% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,260RPM | ▲ H-6136+560 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 418ci | ▲ 1042+340 ci · +81% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ 1042+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 1042+1.8 in · +38% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 178in | ▲ 1042+64 in · +36% |
| Height | 136in | 108in | ▲ 1042+28 in · +26% |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 12,524lb | ▲ 1042+19,091 lb · +152% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9-30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | Hurlimann H-6136 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 2nd percentile (130 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 3rd percentile (418 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 1st percentile (12,524 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 17th percentile (242 in)B · 2nd percentile (178 in)
A · 1042B · H-6136Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor