Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 396 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1038 vs Ford 5000
ChallengerChallenger 1038
vs
FordFord 5000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1038 higher · +327 hp (+473%)1038396 hp
500069.1 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
1038 is in the 97th percentile; 5000 is in the 19th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1038 higher · +525 ci (+225%)1038758 ci
5000233 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1038 is in the 96th percentile; 5000 is in the 21st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 1038 higher · +2 (+50%)10386
50004
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1038 is in the 74th percentile; 5000 is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Width
▲ 1038 higher · +39.9 in (+59%)1038108 in
500068.1 in
Median Agricultural Tractor79.5 in
1038 is in the 91st percentile; 5000 is in the 32nd · 497 models
1038 (A)5000 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ford | — |
| Model | 1038 | 5000 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 396hp | 69.1hp | ▲ 1038+327 hp · +473% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 5000+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1038+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 758ci | 233ci | ▲ 1038+525 ci · +225% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.2in | ▲ 1038+0.8 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 4.2in | ▲ 1038+2.3 in · +55% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 108in | 68.1in | ▲ 1038+39.9 in · +59% |
| Height | 136in | 63.4in | ▲ 1038+72.6 in · +115% |
| Wheelbase | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensing | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type IV | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power assist | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24V) | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 97th percentile (396 hp)B · 19th percentile (69.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 21st percentile (233 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 31st percentile (4)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 91st percentile (108 in)B · 32nd percentile (68.1 in)
Height
median 111 inA · 94th percentile (136 in)B · 9th percentile (63.4 in)
A · 1038B · 5000Median Agricultural Tractor