Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 396 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1038 vs Fendt 208V
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 208V
Orchard/Vineyard
- power
- 80.5 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1038
vs
FendtFendt 208V
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1038 higher · +316 hp (+392%)1038396 hp
208V80.5 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
1038 is in the 97th percentile; 208V is in the 28th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1038 higher · +557 ci (+277%)1038758 ci
208V201 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1038 is in the 96th percentile; 208V is in the 16th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 1038 higher · +3 (+100%)10386
208V3
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1038 is in the 74th percentile; 208V is in the 8th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1038 higher · +25,310 lb (+401%)103831,615 lb
208V6,305 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1038 is in the 95th percentile; 208V is in the 22nd · 971 models
1038 (A)208V (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 1038 | 208V | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 396hp | 80.5hp | ▲ 1038+316 hp · +392% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 208V+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 1038+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 758ci | 201ci | ▲ 1038+557 ci · +277% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ 1038+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 1038+1.8 in · +38% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 141in | ▲ 1038+101 in · +72% |
| Width | 108in | 45.3in | ▲ 1038+62.7 in · +138% |
| Height | 136in | 95in | ▲ 1038+41 in · +43% |
| Wheelbase | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 6,305lb | ▲ 1038+25,310 lb · +401% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24V) | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 97th percentile (396 hp)B · 28th percentile (80.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 16th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 8th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 22nd percentile (6,305 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 95th percentile (242 in)B · 21st percentile (141 in)
A · 1038B · 208VMedian Agricultural Tractor