Image not recorded
CaterpillarModel A
Caterpillar R3
Crawler
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 350 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Crawler
Crawler
Utility
How they compare
R3 is in the 44th percentile; XJ25 is in the 3rd · 191 models
R3 is in the 33rd percentile; XJ25 is in the 10th · 192 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | LS | — |
| Model | R3 | XJ25 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 24.4hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,100RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ XJ25+1,400 RPM · +127% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ R3+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 350ci | 80.4ci | ▲ R3+270 ci · +335% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 3.1in | ▲ R3+1.4 in · +45% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 3.6in | ▲ R3+1.9 in · +53% |
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 103in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 44.9in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 85in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,830lb | — |
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Spec | Caterpillar R3 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context