CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 620
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 620 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH Steiger 620 vs Schluter Compact 750
SchluterModel B
Schluter Compact 750
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 218 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 620
vs
SchluterSchluter Compact 750
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 620 higher · +552 hp (+812%)Steiger 620620 hp
Compact 75068 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
Steiger 620 is in the 97th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Steiger 620 higher · +569 ci (+261%)Steiger 620787 ci
Compact 750218 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
Steiger 620 is in the 39th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ Steiger 620 higher · +3 (+100%)Steiger 6206
Compact 7503
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
Steiger 620 is in the 50th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ Steiger 620 higher · +4 (+33%)Steiger 62016
Compact 75012
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
Steiger 620 is in the 50th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 27th · 146 models
Steiger 620 (A)Compact 750 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Schluter | — |
| Model | Steiger 620 | Compact 750 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Schluter | — |
| Model | Not recorded | SDM 110 W 3 | — |
| Power Output | 620hp | 68hp | ▲ Steiger 620+552 hp · +812% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ Steiger 620+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 787ci | 218ci | ▲ Steiger 620+569 ci · +261% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 4.3in | ▲ Steiger 620+1 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 4.9in | ▲ Steiger 620+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 300in | 155in | ▲ Steiger 620+145 in · +94% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 156in | 96.9in | ▲ Steiger 620+59.1 in · +61% |
| Operating Weight | 48,147lb | 7,342lb | ▲ Steiger 620+40,805 lb · +556% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | hydraulic articulated | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | hydraulic articulated | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 620 | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 97th percentile (620 hp)B · 1st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 39th percentile (787 ci)B · 1st percentile (218 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 87th percentile (48,147 lb)B · 1st percentile (7,342 lb)
A · Steiger 620B · Compact 750Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor