CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 220
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 220 vs Steyr 1100
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220
vs
SteyrSteyr 1100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 220 higher · +120 hp (+120%)Puma 220220 hp
1100100 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 220 is in the 82nd percentile; 1100 is in the 25th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 220 higher · +46 ci (+13%)Puma 220411 ci
1100365 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 220 is in the 60th percentile; 1100 is in the 43rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2206
11006
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 220 is in the 50th percentile; 1100 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 220 higher · +6 (+50%)Puma 22018
110012
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 220 is in the 61st percentile; 1100 is in the 27th · 1,200 models
Puma 220 (A)1100 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | Puma 220 | 1100 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Steyr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | WD 610.40 | — |
| Power Output | 220hp | 100hp | ▲ Puma 220+120 hp · +120% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 220+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 365ci | ▲ Puma 220+46 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.5in | ▲ Puma 220+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 170in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 98in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,900lb | 9,437lb | ▲ Puma 220+6,463 lb · +68% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 28,660lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 82nd percentile (220 hp)B · 25th percentile (100 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 43rd percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)B · 27th percentile (9,437 lb)
A · Puma 220B · 1100Median Row Crop Tractor