CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 220
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 220 vs Mahindra 6065
Image not recorded
MahindraModel B
Mahindra 6065
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 162 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 15
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220
vs
MahindraMahindra 6065
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 220 higher · +158 hp (+255%)Puma 220220 hp
606562 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 220 is in the 82nd percentile; 6065 is in the 9th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 220 higher · +249 ci (+154%)Puma 220411 ci
6065162 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 220 is in the 60th percentile; 6065 is in the 4th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Puma 220 higher · +3 (+100%)Puma 2206
60653
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 220 is in the 50th percentile; 6065 is in the 2nd · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 220 higher · +3 (+20%)Puma 22018
606515
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 220 is in the 61st percentile; 6065 is in the 33rd · 1,200 models
Puma 220 (A)6065 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Mahindra | — |
| Model | Puma 220 | 6065 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Mahindra | — |
| Power Output | 220hp | 62hp | ▲ Puma 220+158 hp · +255% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ Puma 220+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 162ci | ▲ Puma 220+249 ci · +154% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.8in | ▲ Puma 220+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.8in | ▲ Puma 220+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 73.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 104in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,900lb | 6,096lb | ▲ Puma 220+9,804 lb · +161% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/IIIN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 28,660lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Mahindra 6065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 82nd percentile (220 hp)B · 9th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 4th percentile (162 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 2nd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 33rd percentile (15)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)B · 12th percentile (6,096 lb)
A · Puma 220B · 6065Median Row Crop Tractor