Comparing AGCO RT120 vs CaseIH Puma 150 X

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the AGCO RT120 and the CaseIH Puma 150 X. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

AGCO RT120
View tractor
CaseIH Puma 150 X
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Cummins FPT
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - 24-valve
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 408 410.6
Engine - Bore (in) 4.094 4.09
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 150 150
Transmission
Transmission - Type Continuously variable transmission (CVT) / Partial powershift Partial power shift
Transmission - Forward Gears Infinite (2-range) / 32 18
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - -
Width (in) - -
Height (in) - -
Operating Weight (lb) 15055 (4WD CVT Cab) -
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 2WD 4WD
Steering Type Hydrostatic power Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Ag
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type III/IIIN -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Hitch - Position | Rear Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - -
Starter Type Electric Starter (12 volts) Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) Pressure Flow Compensated