Comparing Belarus 310 vs CaseIH Puma 145

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Belarus 310 and the CaseIH Puma 145. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Belarus 310
View tractor
CaseIH Puma 145
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Belarus FPT
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type - Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 2 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 127 410.6
Engine - Bore (in) 4.13 4.094
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM - 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 36 146-188
Transmission
Transmission - Type Sliding Gear Full power shift / Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission - Forward Gears 8 18 (alternative option is infinite with CVT)
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - -
Width (in) - 61.4 to 88.8
Height (in) - -
Operating Weight (lb) 4800 14350
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type - -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 10 -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag -
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type Rear type II 2/3N
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Open -
Starter Type - Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - Electro-hydraulic wet disc
Hydraulic System Type - Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)