Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH JXU 95
Utility
- power
- 95.2 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH JXU 95 vs Massey Ferguson 210
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH JXU 95
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ JXU 95 higher · +70.2 hp (+281%)JXU 9595.2 hp
21025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
JXU 95 is in the 81st percentile; 210 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ JXU 95 higher · +197 ci (+255%)JXU 95274 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
JXU 95 is in the 79th percentile; 210 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ JXU 95 higher · +2 (+100%)JXU 954
2102
Median Utility Tractor4
JXU 95 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedJXU 9512
21012
Median Utility Tractor12
JXU 95 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
JXU 95 (A)210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | JXU 95 | 210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | Toyosha | — |
| Model | NEF F4C | P126 | — |
| Power Output | 95.2hp | 25hp | ▲ JXU 95+70.2 hp · +281% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 210+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 | ▲ JXU 95+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 274ci | 77.1ci | ▲ JXU 95+197 ci · +255% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.6in | ▲ JXU 95+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 3.7in | ▲ JXU 95+1.5 in · +41% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 162in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 103in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,369lb | 2,325lb | ▲ JXU 95+7,044 lb · +303% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH JXU 95 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95.2 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 83rd percentile (9,369 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,325 lb)
A · JXU 95B · 210Median Utility Tractor