Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9270
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH 9270 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 9270 higher · +50 hp (+18%)9270335 hp
65C285 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
9270 is in the 38th percentile; 65C is in the 22nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9270 higher · +217 ci (+34%)9270855 ci
65C638 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
9270 is in the 61st percentile; 65C is in the 23rd · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92706
65C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
9270 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9270 higher · +2 (+20%)927012
65C10
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
9270 is in the 27th percentile; 65C is in the 11th · 146 models
9270 (A)65C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9270 | 65C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 285hp | ▲ 9270+50 hp · +18% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 638ci | ▲ 9270+217 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.8in | ▲ 9270+0.7 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 6in | 6in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift; fully synchronized | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 232in | ▲ 9270+48 in · +21% |
| Width | 96in | 120in | ▲ 65C+24 in · +25% |
| Height | 150in | 128in | ▲ 9270+22 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 34,045lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 9270+1,170 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | 11gal | ▲ 9270+5.5 gal · +50% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 22nd percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 23rd percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 11th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 38th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · 9270B · 65CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor