Comparing Bobcat CT5545 vs Ford 641

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Bobcat CT5545 and the Ford 641. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Bobcat CT5545
View tractor
Ford 641
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Daedong Ford
Engine - Model Daedong 3FT EAE Red Tiger
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline/LP-gas
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 3 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 111.4 134
Engine - Bore (in) 3.43 3.43
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2600 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 44.9 32.8
Transmission
Transmission - Type Hydrostatic Unsynchronized gear
Transmission - Forward Gears - 4
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 139.6 -
Width (in) - -
Height (in) - -
Operating Weight (lb) 4315 3285
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x2
Drive Type 4WD 2WD
Steering Type Power Manual
Coolant Capacity (qts) - 15
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 24 28
Rear Tire Width (in) 13.6 -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Standard (ag), Lawn/Turf, Industrial Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year - 1962
Hitch Type Type I -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - Open
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type - Transmission
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - 540
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - Differential mechanical expanding shoe
Hydraulic System Type - Open Center