Comparing Belarus 592 MIG vs CaseIH Farmall 25A

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Belarus 592 MIG and the CaseIH Farmall 25A. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Belarus 592 MIG
View tractor
CaseIH Farmall 25A
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Belarus Mitsubishi
Engine - Model D-242c -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 4 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 289.9 80.4
Engine - Bore (in) 4.331 3.07
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 1800 2500
Engine - Power Output (hp) 70 24.6
Transmission
Transmission - Type Synchromesh sync shuttle / hydrostatic
Transmission - Forward Gears 9 (discrepancy noted in data source) 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 154.7 117.2
Width (in) 77.6 -
Height (in) 110.2 88.2
Operating Weight (lb) 8378 2469
Miscellaneous
Chassis - -
Drive Type - -
Steering Type Power -
Coolant Capacity (qts) 21.1 -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - -
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type - -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - -
Starter Type Electric Electric Starter
PTO Type - 540 (1.375)
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Open Center Open Center