Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +258 hp (+936%)30027.5 hp
65C285 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; 65C is in the 99th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +543 ci (+570%)30095.2 ci
65C638 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; 65C is in the 99th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +4 (+200%)3002
65C6
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; 65C is in the 99th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +1 (+11%)3009
65C10
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 62nd · 616 models
300 (A)65C (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Challenger | — |
| Model | 300 | 65C | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+258 hp · +936% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 300+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 6 | ▲ 65C+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+543 ci · +570% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.8in | ▲ 65C+1.1 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 6in | ▲ 65C+1.7 in · +40% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+29,075 lb · +765% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 99th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 99th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 99th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 62nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 99th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · 300B · 65CMedian Sub-Compact Tractor