Image not recorded
Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRX 9800
Utility
- power
- 87 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRX 9800
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +198 hp (+228%)TRX 980087 hp
65C285 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TRX 9800 is in the 76th percentile; 65C is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +435 ci (+214%)TRX 9800203 ci
65C638 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TRX 9800 is in the 55th percentile; 65C is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)TRX 98004
65C6
Median Utility Tractor4
TRX 9800 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TRX 9800 higher · +6 (+60%)TRX 980016
65C10
Median Utility Tractor12
TRX 9800 is in the 73rd percentile; 65C is in the 39th · 4,941 models
TRX 9800 (A)65C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | Challenger | — |
| Model | TRX 9800 | 65C | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 87hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+198 hp · +228% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ TRX 9800+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 203ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+435 ci · +214% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.8in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 6in | ▲ 65C+1.7 in · +40% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 134in | 232in | ▲ 65C+98 in · +73% |
| Width | 54.3in | 120in | ▲ 65C+65.7 in · +121% |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,004lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+27,871 lb · +557% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Stage 3A | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 9800 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Both (ROPS and Cab available) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 76th percentile (87 hp)B · 96th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (203 ci)B · 95th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 48th percentile (5,004 lb)B · 98th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · TRX 9800B · 65CMedian Utility Tractor