Comparing Allis Chalmers WF vs Ford 2600

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Allis Chalmers WF and the Ford 2600. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Allis Chalmers WF
View tractor
Ford 2600
View tractor
Images No images available No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Allis Chalmers Ford
Engine - Model - Ford 2.6L 3-cyl diesel or Ford 2.6L 3-cyl gasoline
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel or Gasoline
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 4 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 201 158
Engine - Bore (in) 4 4.21
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM - 2000
Engine - Power Output (hp) - Diesel: 32.47 HP, Gasoline: 32.78 HP
Transmission
Transmission - Type Gear Gear type
Transmission - Forward Gears 4 6 forward
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - 8 total
Dimensions
Length (in) 118.75 126.5
Width (in) 57.5 52
Height (in) 55 52.5
Operating Weight (lb) 3175 6000
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x2 2WD
Drive Type 2WD 2WD
Steering Type Manual Manual or power (option)
Coolant Capacity (qts) - 11
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) 5.5 6.5
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 24 24
Rear Tire Width (in) 11.25 14.9
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year - 1981
Hitch Type - Three-Point Hitch
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - 1975 lbs
Operator Station Type - Open operator station or two-post ROPS (optional)
Starter Type - Electric
PTO Type - Optional Transmission or Live PTO
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - 540
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - Differential mechanical expanding shoe
Hydraulic System Type - -