Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 190
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 265 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 190 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 190
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +373 ci (+141%)190265 ci
65C638 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
190 is in the 20th percentile; 65C is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1906
65C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
190 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+25%)1908
65C10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
190 is in the 16th percentile; 65C is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +25,210 lb (+329%)1907,665 lb
65C32,875 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
190 is in the 18th percentile; 65C is in the 99th · 1,350 models
190 (A)65C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Challenger | — |
| Model | 190 | 65C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | G2500 | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 285hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 190+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 265ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+373 ci · +141% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.8in | ▲ 65C+1.1 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 4in | 6in | ▲ 65C+2 in · +50% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,665lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+25,210 lb · +329% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Allis Snap-Coupler, Three-Point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Band actuated disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.5gal | 11gal | ▲ 65C+6.5 gal · +144% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 190 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 20th percentile (265 ci)B · 98th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 16th percentile (8)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 18th percentile (7,665 lb)B · 99th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · 190B · 65CMedian Row Crop Tractor